Responsiveness Shouldn’t be Unusual in Law

In our firm, we pride ourselves on responding to clients within at least a four hour window, unless we’re in hearings or discoveries. The response may simply be “I’m working on a deadline right now, but I’ll get back to you by the end of the day” but it is a response.

I cannot tell you how many times I’m told by new clients that this response time is unusual: it shouldn’t be. If a client is reaching out to us, its because they need help. This isn’t usually a time of calm for them, it’s a time requiring action, or at the very least a plan.

Because I have over 27 years experience as a lawyer, I know how long things take to accomplish. This means I can set realistic deadlines for work clients want completed. Of course, I generally like to use the “Scotty Principle”. Scotty was a character on the original Star Trek and he always over estimated how long a repair would take in order to shine in the eyes of his captain when it got done sooner. Our firm uses the Scotty Principle – this ensures the client has a timeline in which they know they’ll get their work back and they’re usually thrilled to have it sooner than the timeline. Of course, it also gives us a buffer in case we get a rush that needs to take priority.

If your lawyer isn’t able to respond promptly or give you a timeline for work completion, you need to ask why. The answer may tell you its time to find another lawyer.

Inga B. Andriessen, JD

Skip to content
Share via
Copy link