Remembrance Day – Thank-you Veterans

Tomorrow we pause at 11 a.m. to remember those who have given their lives to ensure the freedom of our country.

I’ve written before about the personal impact that the Canadian Veterans have on our law firm – but for liberating Holland at the end of WWII, there would be no firm.

Of course, as Canadians, we daily have the sacrifice of Veterans to thank for the freedoms we enjoy.

Thank-you Veterans, we literally owe you everything.

In Flanders Fields
By: Lieutenant Colonel John McCrae, MD (1872-1918)
Canadian Army
In Flanders Fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

Movember

When we’re not spending our time advocating on our client’s behalf, or otherwise, fighting for their rights, lawyers can be a downright generous lot. Besides the pro bono work that we do when we use our legal skills on behalf of those who would otherwise have little access to the justice system, we tend to spend a good deal of time and/or money on other worthwhile causes.

Here at the firm, a few of use volunteer our time to coach children’s sports (soccer and hockey being particular favorites) in the local community. We also take a day off work during the holiday season to sort toys for the CP24 CHUM Christmas Wish. The office is also a focal point for various charitable fundraising activities.

This year I will be participating in Movember – the month long campaign to grow a moustache in support of prostate cancer research and men’s health issues generally. Being somewhat follicularly challenged, this promises to be an amusing month for those around me.

Although I have my own personal reasons for supporting the cause, I am predominantly driven by how overwhelming the statistics are:

• Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among Canadian men – it will afflict 1 in 7 men.

• There are 177,800 new cases of cancer and 75,000 cancer deaths expected in Canada in 2011.

• In 2011 there will be more cases of prostate cancer diagnosed than breast cancer.

• Testicular cancer is the most common cancer in young men in Canada between the ages of 15-29.

If you are able to donate, please do, and if not, feel free to watch along as I slowly transform from a mild-mannered corporate lawyer into a regular Magnum P.I..

http://mobro.co/sry

Scott R. Young

Employment Law Update

Our firm’s monthly lunch and learn next Wednesday, October 19, 2011 is “How to Hire & How to Fire”.

If you are a client of the firm and are interested in the topic, please email to be included on the guest list. As always there is no charge and lunch is provided.

There are lots of issues to consider when hiring/firing people these days and no matter how small or big your company, you are expected to know these things if someone complains.

Looking forward to seeing you Wednesdaay.

Inga B. Andriessen JD

Thanksgiving Musings

This weekend is a time to reflect on the year that has passed and the things and people we are thankful for.

As I type this blog, news of Steve Jobs’ passing is the headline of the day as is the Ontario election.

I am thankful for the technology that Steve Jobs inspired. I am an unabashed iPhone lover, much to the chagrin of our firm’s IT Manager. Steve Jobs understood that users need to have tech that works, we don’t need to understand how it works – thank-you Steve.

I am also thankful to live in a democracy where I get to choose who represents me in government. The people of the Middle East and in particular Libya right now, understand how important that right is. I hope today’s election turnout reflects how grateful we are to have the right to vote.

Moving away from the headlines, I’m thankful for the great group of people who work with me at Andriessen & Associates. It’s fantastic to have people who take the work seriously, but are able to have a lighthearted office environment.

Finally, I’m thankful for the interesting and challenging work our clients trust us with. There are many law firms in GTA, but our clients know us to be the best Business Lawyers for their needs and I value that greatly.

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

Inga B. Andriessen, JD

It's getting hard to avoid service of Court documents

As a trial lawyer, one of the challenges that I can face very early in the law suit is serving the defendant with notice of our claim against them.

My experience in the past 18 years, is that people who are hiding assets or avoiding payment are often reluctant to accept service of documents … imagine that!

When I started practicing law our options were a bit more limited than today: we could serve people at their place of work (with the Court’s approval) or at a close relative if we could assure the Court the document would come to the debtor’s attention.

Just this week I obtained an Order validating service of a debtor at his place of work when all of the other address information for him, did not produce confirmation that he was at those addresses. The Judge, correctly, believed that the document would come to the debtor’s attention … as the debtor called me on the phone this morning, I have evidence that supports that belief.

Case law is now taking things a step further – some cases are allowing people to be served on Facebook, Twitter & other social media accounts.

This may seem “progressive” but it is the same test that I relied on this week to serve the debtor at work – will the document come to the debtor’s attention?

The times are changing, yes. However, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Inga B. Andriessen, JD
Sr. Trial Lawyer

Legal Fees Explained

If you have a shop that sells widgets, your billing strategy is usually pretty simple. You put a price on your widgets and when a customer comes in, they tend to know how many widgets they want to buy. They look at the price of the widgets and if it’s reasonable in the context of the larger widget market, they pay for their widgets and leave with them.

Service-oriented businesses are very different – their widgets are the time they spend providing you with a particular expertise. Businesses that provide the same services over and over are able to set their billing strategies much like a regular widget shop. You, the customer, know what service you want and if the price is right, you pay accordingly and get your service.

Professional expertise services, like legal services, are a little bit different. Our widgets tend to vary greatly with every customer who walks in the door. There are certain things we do over and over, that are similar enough for us to be able to figure out (more or less) how much time, effort and expense it’s going to take to get the job done, there are also a lot of things that we do that are completely different each time we do them. The Small Claims Court work we do and a few of our corporate services are in the first group. For those things, we offer a flat rate and there is clarity for the client. However, the vast majority of what we do is to use our knowledge, experience and analytical skills to represent a client in work that is largely unpredictable in many respects.

For transactional matters, it is impossible to predict how much documentation is going to be required, how many searches are going to be needed, what the scale of due diligence is going to be, how intractable the parties’ positions are going to be with respect to negotiating the minutia of the deal.

For litigation we can’t predict exactly what steps a defendant will take that will incur time and cost, however, as we proceed through the matter we use our 18 years’ experience to help our clients take the most cost efficient steps possible.

For these reasons, clients are often faced with having to pay for our work based on the hours we spend on the matter. When that’s the case, there are so many factors that can affect you bill, that it is impossible to give an accurate estimate. We might be able to give you a ballpark estimate, but narrowing it down is difficult.

Knowing how lawyers bill should help to provide you with a framework for keeping your fees as low as possible. Working with the system, and not against it, is key. Here are some simple ways to reduce your bill:

• Use time wisely. Prioritize your needs and let your lawyer know what those priorities are. There is no sense in paying to have your lawyer go down an avenue of inquiry that isn’t that important to you.

• Communicate efficiently. While this is important in meetings, it is doubly so in written correspondence. Grouping questions together so that your lawyer can review the file once, or communicate with the opposing parties involved and report back to you, is much more cost effective than asking questions one at a time and paying for each subsequent correspondence.

• Review our reports. We try to put as much information as possible in our reporting letters, e-mails and conversations with you. Make sure you have reviewed them and understand the content before making a decision or asking a question. The only thing more painful than paying a lawyer to answer a question is paying them to answer it twice.

• Be organized. Bring all the documentation you have on a matter to us at the outset. Let us decide what is relevant. If we have to track you down, that’s going to cost you.

• Be on top of your bill. Know how much you owe and be aware of how the way a matter is progressing is going to be billed. If you have a budget, let us know about so we can tell you what you can reasonably expect from us. We don’t bill on a sliding scale, but there are different approaches that can be taken with an eye to costs.

Scott R. Young

Introducing the newest member of our firm !

I’m happy to introduce Murray Brown, Paralegal, licensed with the Law Society of Upper Canada, as the newest addition to our business law firm.

Murray has 9 years experience litigating in Small Claims Court – he has already proven to be a wealth of experience and great resource to all of us in his first week on the job.

Murray is a graduate of the Sheridan College Court & Tribunal Agent Program and is currently finishing his Law Clerk Certificate at Humber College.

Murray will be handling the Small Claims Court matters in our firm in consultation with the trial lawyers at our firm, so if you’re a client who has small claims matters with us, Murray will be in touch with you shortly.

Welcome aboard Murray !!!

Spam

Canada’s new Anti-Spam and Online Fraud Act is expected to come into effect sometime this fall and promises to have a significant impact on any business that communicates with the public through e-mail or other commercial electronic messages (including cell phone spam).

The Act moves Canada into line with the European model, where companies must require active opt-in consent to be put on e-mail lists. The proposed Act demands that companies either have that explicit consent or the implied consent of having done business with the customer in the past two years.

However, companies will want to run a tight ship when it comes to recording that consent and monitoring that two-year window – penalties in the new Act are significant. Fines range up to $1 million for individual offenses and $10 million for corporations, and of course there are penalties available against directors – something we’re seeing more and more of.

One of the more interesting aspects of the penalty provision of the Act is the private right of action, or self-help, remedy. This allows individuals to pursue infringing organizations on their own and to collect the penalties themselves. This is a significant measure that will provide a considerable incentive for aggrieved parties to enforce the legislation from the bottom up.

There is no doubt that the legislation will have a significant impact, as it has in every other jurisdiction where similar legislation has been enacted. If your business engages in electronic communications with the public or with your customer base, please speak with your legal counsel as soon as possible to find out what you need to do in order to be fully compliant with the Act before it comes into force.

Scott R. Young

Balance … as defined by the Governor General

The Canadian Governor General spoke at the Canadian Bar ASsociation annual meeting this month and decreed that lawyers must pay back their “debt to society” by having 10% of their work be pro bono (free) work.

He then went on to decree that law firms need to find a better balance between work & real life, presumeably by having people work fewer hours.

I take issue with the above.

First – by being a lawyer, I didn’t become a criminal, which is where the phrase “debt owed to society” is usually applied. The only “debt” I had at the time of graduation was a student loan, that I paid back.

We are a profession and should behave as such – of course, that would be easier to point out in the media if the Law Society didn’t admit convicted kidnappers into the bar as lawyers.

With respect to increasing the pro bono work and decreasing the work hours – how does the Governor General propose that financially is workable?

Lately many Judges are speaking out against what they perceive as aggregiously high legal fees being sought against losing parties. Given the words of the Governor General, the fees can only be going higher in order to pay staff more for working less and of course, working for free.

Am I the only one who finds that this doesn’t make sense?

Inga B. Andriessen, JD

Really Alternative Dispute Resolution

When I was in law school, I worked in the University of Ottawa’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program as a teaching assistant, and later, as a researcher. The program taught practical dispute resolution techniques to law students in an attempt to give them tools to settle problems with something other than a lawsuit.

With more than 95% of cases initiated in Ontario settling at some point before trial, the program sought to enable lawyers to spot early resolution opportunities in order to provide better outcomes for clients. Among the program’s features, was the teaching of negotiation, mediation and arbitration processes and techniques. And it was incredibly practical for lawyers entering the practice, as ADR is on the rise throughout the profession; it’s even being mandated in many cases. Even the Rules of Professional Conduct, which govern the behaviour of lawyers in Ontario, require that lawyers engage in reasonable attempts to resolve disputes through means other than litigation whenever possible.

With all that said, I was still surprised (and amused) this week to see news that indie game developer Markus Persson (of Minecraft fame – and riches) offered (quite seriously) to settle a trade-mark infringement claim made against his upcoming game, with a winner-take-all game of Quake 3 Arena. While this settlement lacks some of the important aspects that the Trade-marks Opposition Board might look for, like, say, evidence of use or rights to the mark, it is attractive in its finality and economy – presumably the cost of setting up the virtual deathmatch is less expensive than paying legal fees for competent counsel.

As a lawyer, I could never recommend this sort of settlement arrangement to a client; giving up your legal rights to chance, or skill in a video game, just doesn’t mesh with the rationality of the practice of law. But as a person with a sense of humour, I will be following the story with interest.

But as always I will be reflecting on my alternative dispute resolution experience and whenever possible, trying to help our clients find the best result we can, in the quickest time, for the least money. It’s what we do.

Scott R. Young